Thread: NFL 2006 Season Thread
View Single Post
Old 09-25-2006, 06:42 PM   #467
DrA
 
Posts: 24,537
DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme
No, by my logic the Bengals are undefeated because they went 11-5 last year and are playing this year with 19 returning starters plus 2 new big FA signings. I'm comparing teams from their performance last year mixed with the various roster changes made during the offseason. It's not hard to do. Flawed logic would be assuming that every team starts at the same level of talent at the beginning of the year and only after the season is over can we say who was good and who was bad. Did you honestly think the 49ers and the Texans were Super Bowl contenders at the start of the year? We don't have to wait til Week 15 to claim the Raiders won't make the playoffs.
What about teams like the Rams? The Cardinals? The Jets?

There's no way you can determine how good teams like that are in only three weeks.
DrA is offline