Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AssMan
what definition are you talking about? and how are you so sure that the Tigers watch a lot of footage?
|
My definition would be that they don't have ONE great player, they all have different ways of contributing to the team, and Jim Leyland has been a great motivator this year, not to mention Dombrowski and all the coaches and trainers who I'm sure are glad they haven't put in a completely useless year (yet). They play as a cohesive unit and they support each other through the good games and the bad, and if we should happen to drop the ALCS or god forbid, the WS if they got there this year, it's ok, they'll all be a little more experienced and a little bit wiser, and I think that at this point Detroit will be the team to beat in all of baseball in 2007, as they could easily win over 100 games if they kept their current line-up and stayed healthy most of the season.
UPDATE--its 2-0 in the bottom of the 3rd right now as we discuss the definition of a team...in favor of DETROIT! W
! (sorry couldn't stand the excitement)