|
I dont think the legacy ending does make sense. If you end it now, then what did it ever mean. If he loses to Batista, then why didn't he job to Orton? Why didnt he job to Kane at 14? Why didn't Flair win his big match back in 02?
Its just stupid to me to come this far and have it broken by a guy who doesn't need to get over, and isn't going anywhere but down or onto the injured list until his eventual retirement only years into his late career stint at the top.
What is gained from this match? Nothing is gained, and a lot is lost.
Under the scenario that Taker in fact wins the title, which I'd prefer of the two outcomes, its still shitty. He has nothing to prove as a champion and he has his wrestlemania title win. Undertaker is one of few guys who is actually more interesting without the belt, and unless its part of a final run before retirement he shouldnt hold the belt again when theres a bunch of wiser choices.
|