View Single Post
Old 12-03-2006, 01:20 PM   #814
Jesus Shuttlesworth
 
Jesus Shuttlesworth's Avatar
 
Posts: 42,765
Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)Jesus Shuttlesworth got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCWWF
Also, I don't believe that the BCS system is as messed up as other people. Yeah, it would be cool to have the playoffs and everything, but with the BCS, absolutely every game counts. If you are 10-0 and have the division wrapped up, you can't give your best guys a rest and afford a loss, and you know that is what would happen. I would say that 9 times out of 10 the BCS gets it right, and the BCS champion can legitimately be considered the champion of college football.

The other argument is that getting rid of this system would get rid of the bowl system, and while that sounds good in a way, I don't think it is. The most they can possibly have is a 16 team playoffs, starting next week and ending the first week of January. So now you have 16 teams, what about the other 40 or so teams that go to bowls? That is a major source of cash for the schools and allows teams to play cool teams that they would otherwise never schedule.

And going back to my last post, having a playoff doesn't name you the best team in college football. Having a playoff gets you the best team in the playoffs. Were the Pittsburgh Steelers the best team in football last year? Absolutely not, but they were the Super Bowl Champions. Were the Texas Longhorns the best team in college football, I think you can say yes. That is why I think the system works. It gets you the best single matchup in college football, no underdog shit, and it makes the whole season count. If Florida doesn't get in there this year, you can bet that there are going to be a lot better non-conference games in the future.
lol

You get way too deep into your thoughts sometimes - its football. The team that wins is the best team. If you tear it up in the regular season but then in the NFL playoffs you can't win when you're the "better team" then you really aren't the better team then.

I don't get how Michigan got worse while not playing a game I mean Florida played a much tougher schedule but I thought the BCS was about finding the 2 best teams? I think Michigan is better team then Florida

I'm taking a playoff system all day over the BCS, I dunno how you can even consider the champion decided by a computer better then letting them decide it on the field. Every game doesn't really count though, since a few 1 loss teams are gonna be on the outside looking in. Who is the better team out of those 1 loss teams? Out of like the 10 people talking about on this board we are all split on who is better.

Last edited by Jesus Shuttlesworth; 12-03-2006 at 01:23 PM.
Jesus Shuttlesworth is offline