Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the Illusionist
As long as you keep refering to TNA as a 'refreshing alternative', it will always be second best.WCW was never called an alternative, and it gave WWE a run for its money. Add to that having nothing bad to say, or even negative or constructive, is also bad for business. It's short sighted and adds to dellusion...wwe all know what that does to a promotion. By the way, you canforget about calling me a WWE mark, as I can see plenty wrong with the damn thing. So thanks.
Thats all for now.
|
...so the only reason TNA will never succeed is because some people have termed it a "refreshing alternative"?
...and the reason WCW succeeded was because we never called them an alternative.
Are you fucking high?