Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fallen Angel
Yes they will both headline Mania, that was a bit obvious  Its Taker, nuff said, as for Micheals, he always has a good WM match if he is on the active roster, his WM20 match was great even though he lost.
I was dissapointed by the ECW Match, but more so over the WWE title, I mean c'mon Vince gave away Cenas win, when he said that he wouldn't see Cena with the belt much longer, and Cena being the one who relentlessly defies the odds and keeps the title for 90%+ of two years, would obviously wi n it. They need to get the title away from him, and as for the Hardyz as much markish I am towards them, yes they should have lost.
I am not even going to get into hypocrisy with you.
You me, and the rest of the world will likely never know if we would be better at running WWE, so Im not going to argue that topic, but If anyone says that they would take the title off Cena, push Carlito to ME, and fix ECW. and made it happen yes it would be better, then the current state its in.
|
Actually, Taker being Taker doesn't make it 'nuff said, he hasn't main-evented Mania in years, Michaels hasn't since 2004. In your face BOOYAKASHA! (just kiddin buddy)
I never said I wasn't hypocritical, I just said I find hypocrisy funny. And when you think about it WWE is a business, sure its a wrestling business but it's a business all the same. They push Cena ahead of everyone because he sells the most junk. I used to pretty much be the second in command of the "BLARGH! CENA SUCKS MONKEY-BUTT!" club, but I've gotten over that. Yes, I want him to drop the title to see someone new, but it could be worse.
I shudder to think how many of you would be complaining non-stop if we were in the Middle of Bruno Sammartino's EIGHT YEAR reign.