View Single Post
Old 02-10-2007, 11:48 PM   #33
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think it was just the formula of the standard WWE match. People have been saying it needs to change for years, but I'm going to say it again: When a heel dominates a face for most of the match, it should mean something. Batista has been able to work good matches with Finlay and Kennedy, but every match he's in he seems to get dominated.

I can understand why the WWE does that, the apparently want to see the overcoming of the odds. Just for once, though, I'd like to see the WWE make us realise that the odds are in favour of Batista, Bobby Lashley or John Cena. They are dominant, they are physically imposing, and instead of having them look like bitches during the match, why not have them control most of it? This wouldn't turn them heel, because I know that as a mark, if my hero kicked the ass of a bad guy for the majority of the match, I'd be loving every second of it.

I think the WWE should really expand and have some matches where the face dominates a little stronger, then the heel makes a comeback by cheating.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote