Thread: Who would the WWE put over?
View Single Post
Old 02-14-2007, 04:46 PM   #9
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I'm thinking in terms of current (Michaels) vs. Non-permanent (Rock) stars.

If they were both retired or Rock was still in the WWE full-time, I'd give it to Rock. But in the current situation, even if Michaels isn't going to get any rub from it, it makes no sense to put Rock over unless it's a series of matches and Michaels wins in the end.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote