Thread: WM 23 Spoiler
View Single Post
Old 02-20-2007, 09:48 PM   #27
addy2hotty
yes. yes. yes.
 
addy2hotty's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,753
addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeritron5000
So is this match going to be non title, or for both titles. Or for just the ECW title? I need details on this. Because I'm dissapointed but I'd be even more dissapointed if they left 2 belts off the card and put them to waste in this. Why put the IC title on Umaga unless it was gonna be defended here, when it could be defended elsewhere?

Is it just a slap in the face to the people who would like to see that belt defended at a wrestlemania finally after 5 years?
And how can you leave a "world" title off the card.

I must also say, they should have kept Umaga undefeated for this, just so for a second you might believe in the markest of thoughts that Trump might get his head shaved.

this honestly comes as a big shock and a great dissapointment. I demand Umaga be squashed by Foley
In the photo, neither are holding their belts. Neither will lose in the run-in to Mania. So neither the IC or ECW title will be defended. Even though I couldn't care less about the ECW title, its a slap in the face to the talent who have been working on that brand since it returned.

As for the IC title, well, the title has little or no meaning anymore so what does it matter. Hardy should have held it til Mania, he's carried it damn well and deserved it. Dropping it to Umaga so he has a shiny belt for the media is ridiculous.
addy2hotty is offline   Reply With Quote