Thread: IF (Yes, IF) TNA was really owned by Vince...
View Single Post
Old 02-20-2007, 10:08 PM   #13
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
I don't think he would. There's no money in the "Ha! I fooled you! Now I'm going to be the known owner!" scenario. I think it would be better if he just had TNA guys and WWE guys subtley leave their respective promotions, and then get "picked up" by the other.
See, I think you're right that there's no money in it, but I think in most instances, it'd be foolish of him regardless. For one, as long as TNA struggles to get about a third of Smackdown's ratings, there's no purpose in going "HA! I built a second lackluster franchise that and can't even handle fake competition!"
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote