|
I think Kane would be on the same level as the Undertaker, except the WWE does not use his tools well. Kane is generally given less desireable opponents AND put into stupid ass storylines that would hinder the best of matches; just because the crowd will think the entire thing is retarded. A lot of times too, Kane is left off of pay per views, stuck in meaningless tag matches or stuck in one-on-one matches with a horrible storyline attached to it.
I think the Undertaker is given more chances to shine and put in better situations that favour him and thus has more chances to produce better quality matches.
But I agree with you in that the Undertaker is the best big man in professional wrestling today.
|