02-23-2007, 09:47 PM
|
#33
|
ELF ANGEL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeanderCarl
How can Taker win the title from Kane, when Kane isn't the champion?
Why would Taker decide to forgo his main event title match against the champion Batista, to renew his tired old feud with Kane?
Why would Batista agree to allow Kane to defend his title for him?
Why would Undertaker vacate the title he inexplicably won from Kane in order to keep his undefeated streak alive, when there is another year until the next WrestleMania, and he could therefore drop the belt without losing his streak?
Why, after 15 years of build-up, would WWE let lazy washed-up, mashed-up, broken-down Jeff Hardy end the streak?
And why do you think that when WrestleMania goes off the air, the last image you will see is Jeff Hardy stood at the top of a ladder with the WWE World title?
Why, why, why?
Otherwise, everything was great.
|
I thought Kane won the title from Booker, or thats what I heard/read. I don't watch wrestling so I wouldn't know immediatly what happened until its posted on here.
Because Batista is boring as hell, with Kane he has history, and good matches.
When did Batista win it?
It would make sense that he would retire after beating a person he is famous for fighting, and at the PPV he is most famous for.
Its WWE programming right now, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, so In that sense it will likely happen.
|
|
|