Thread: DISCUSSION - What should the WWE do with Brock Lesnar AFTER Wrestlemania?
View Single Post
Old 02-29-2004, 08:37 PM   #9
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Naitch
sweet on the Jericho tip.

But would Trips actually let Lesnar go over?
I think Lesnar is at the point, where it would be tough for Triple H to simply "bury" him. Triple H may have been able to do it to Jericho, RVD, Booker T, Kane, etc., but notice how he couldn't quite do it to Goldberg? If Austin was still a full-time wrestler, he wouldn't be able to do it to Austin either. I think Lesnar is the same way.

If Lesnar was a heel fighting a face Triple H, then I highly doubt that Lesnar would get a clean win anyways. It would probably be a screwjob of sorts (former Evolution member interference?). So with that in mind, I don't think Triple H would mind not having the title. Lesnar getting an 'unclean' victory wouldn't allow him to 'go over', but it's not like he'd never get a title reign due to Triple H's presence.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote