Thread: Different rosters
View Single Post
Old 03-13-2007, 11:20 PM   #2
Dorkchop
facebook.com/bloquemen
 
Posts: 5,452
Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Having three title belts makes each world heavyweight championship belt mean less. Especially when guys like Bobby Lashley are champ and very green.

Would Austin's first heavy weight title victory mean as much had there been three belts to go after (not to mention his chase for it)? No. Same goes for tag teams.. then again the tag division is shit now... and, for the most part, has been ass since the roster split. Though there have been a few good months of tag team goodness.

I like having three rosters in WWE because it does allow a lot of guys tv time who normally wouldn't. But at the same time there are a lot of guys who shouldn't be on tv, or as big as they are (due to three rosters). A guy like Mark Henry in no way what so ever should have been main eventing ppvs.
Last edited by Dorkchop; 03-14-2007 at 12:52 AM.
Dorkchop is offline   Reply With Quote