|
I know exactly what you're saying DarthTeedious, it's just that it is very difficult to make such an accurate comparison as to what might have been considering that there are so many variables. Personally I don't think it would have made that much of a difference. Like it or not, Hogan was very believable and entertaining in the 80's and people paid to see him win (even though more and more people started to become more knowledgeable about the product). Hogan jobbing often would have probably hurt the company more than him winning, and had the internet been available to the public in the 80's with the sort of knowledge that is now known then it would have hurt WWE considerably.
|