Thread: Why wasn't Taker vs. Batista the last match at WrestleMania?
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2007, 07:12 PM   #19
hb2k
Do Unto Others...
 
hb2k's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,086
hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)hb2k has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Cena/HBK did not deserve to main-event. Batista and 'Taker got the best reactions of the night
The most crowd heat was for the Cena/Michaels match. The reason Batista/Taker came off so good was because it was perfectly positioned (not the only reason, but bear with me here) - if they had to go on after that Cena/Michaels match and after Austin, they'd have a harder time getting the fans into it than they ended up having by putting it earlier. Taker/Batista had way less steam as a feud going in and Batista hardly has a great career record of having awesome PPV matches. They made the right move, and it worked out perfectly. Cena/Michaels was right to close.
hb2k is offline   Reply With Quote