|
Micheals v Hart: Michaels. Because Hart was the only one who saw the situation as it was, and could have stopped it by swallowing his pride, and didn't.
Arn v Nash
Would someone please explain this one?
Flair v Foley
Meh, they both had valid points and I think this whole business was seriously overblown.
Warrior v Reality
Warrior and his destrucity beat Reality every time.
Here's one that I'm surprised I haven't seen: Flair vs Rhodes
|