Thread: WCW Bad, WWE Good
View Single Post
Old 04-13-2007, 08:51 PM   #18
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron
And the victor won for a reason.
Unless the reason you have in mind is "sheer fucking luck," No.

Both companies had people at the top who knew shit, but happened to get lucky and click with certain ideas. It's more a random collision of atoms forming life than any real reason of intellect, planning, or creativity.

The actual fall of WCW didn't even really have to do with wrestling, bad booking, or ratings. WWE "won" because out of two incompetent companies, one had the plugged pulled on them for external reasons.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote