Thread: World Champions
View Single Post
Old 05-12-2007, 12:18 AM   #4
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,558
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
But honestly, looking back at things, is there a single person on that list you would not have made a World Champion? In retrospect, Randy Orton and maybe even John Cena (although it may just be me) should not have won a World Title just yet. At the time, though, whilst it wasn't absolutely called for, I wouldn't have called either a blatantly stupid move (although I did disaree with Cena initially winning the WWE Championship).

So yeah, that's why I suggested the percentage thing. Maybe the increase of World Champions just has to do with how many deserving people are on the roster.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote