Thread: Why doesn't WWE just run with real life angles?
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2007, 10:10 PM   #4
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M-A-G
Because they'd be making the same mistake that Vince Russo did when he assumed that every fan knew every single backstage story and why it happened, the same kind of assumptions that led to angles that didn't draw for sh*t. Yes, you and I may know about some things but not everyone. There has never been a time when stuff like this has been guaranteed money in the bank.
Well, except things like Matt Hardy/Edge were well known. Triple H also seems to be something you don't need to be a smark to get.

There's a difference between booking to nuances and booking something that everyone really already knows.

Wouldn't happen, though.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote