Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hb2k
The Batista/Taker feud was pretty shitty to be honest, there was nothing of note in terms of storytelling, whereas Michaels/Cena was much more itneresting with the "will he turn/when will he turn" element. Matchwise, HBK/Cena blew Taker/Batista out the water realistically, although the surprise factor of Batista turning out a pretty good match somehow blinds people to the fact that as a drama builder, HBK/Cena shit on it. Taker/Batista should in no way have been the main event - the fact it did so well and got the reaction it did was because of it's placement on the show. The fact anyone thinks it should be higher actually means it was perfectly placed where it was, because they got the most out of it. Had it been higher it would have had a tougher time getting the same reaction.
|
wtf...shut up. Thats the dumbest thing i've ever heard. well not the dumbest, but wtf are you even talking about. 'The fact it did so well and got the reaction it did was because of it's placement on the show'? WTF....you mean, it had absolutely nothing to do with it being an awesome match...of course not!
- idiot