|
That's not going to help in the long run, not even in the short, people dont care whos where, or who's champion of which show, and their not going to as long as the product they produce continues to be lackluster and boring, and their other shows will suffer in the end.
WWE's doesn't need to move the more popular wrestlers to RAW or Smackdown to gain ratings, its not gonna work, their might be a spike for the first couple shows, maybe and then after that its back to the same rating as before that. Until they change how they run their show, and how they book them, it's going to continue much the same, and wrestling fans are going to keep on caring less and less over time.
Also, having 3 brands and running and booking them pretty much all the same way doesn't help matters any. Dont be afraid to try something different, something new and original.
Like with ECW, I always thought they should have their own tour instead of being Smackdown's bitch. They could hold events in smaller venues, maybe a state over or another city from Smackdown to help keep traveling costs down. Or have them do shows in old ECW territories and house shows. Establish them on their own instead of just as WWE. I know it would be hard at first maybe, but it could work, and is really the only ECW wouuld get over as a whole.
|