Thread: Is ken Kennedy really the future of the wwe?
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2007, 06:18 PM   #58
Rob
Part time poster
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Posts: 22,963
Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesSteele
You judge by pure technical wrestling skills. Shawn Michaels was not the greatest technical wrestlers, but Shawn Michaels could wrestle any style and could work with any style.
He could work against anyone in WWE with their style but I don't know if he work the Lucha or Japanese style or the old European style either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
That's not really a total package though. Benoit was the goods, but he was no total package.
He could work the 4 major styles with ease. Only a few guys could. If he could have had the charisma of Steve Austin, he would have been the biggest star in the business.

NOBODY can argue that Shawn Michaels isn't in the top 5 best wrestlers in the WWE in the last 20 years.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote