Thread: Would fewer major title defenses help the WWE?
View Single Post
Old 08-14-2007, 01:26 PM   #3
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
You're a wise guy, WWKD, and while your idea would work in theory, it would need to be done right. The built-up matches would need to mean something, which would require good writing, and if we had that, we wouldn't be discussing this in the first place, because the WWE wouldn't be completely helpless.

I don't think I could ever be interested in a John Cena title defence, and while your suggestion could work out better than what the WWE currently have in place, I expect them to butcher it, and ruin it. Is there anything they don't ruin?
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote