Thread: Would fewer major title defenses help the WWE?
View Single Post
Old 08-14-2007, 05:23 PM   #21
Pepsi Man
 
Pepsi Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,983
Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FourFifty
The bookers and writers couldn't help but play the game of musical titles on SmackDown. With the SmackDown curse are you really going to keep the title on someone with an injury? WWE has only done that once as far as I know, with the women's title (hence why Trish Stratus held the women's title as long as she did).
As of Raw, Cena has held onto the title for a while, so they're not moving that one too often. One could make the argument that they're not moving it enough, but then we'd bitch about how the title means nothing because it has been passed around like Lita at a kegger.
Damn. So three new champions every ten minutes?
Pepsi Man is offline   Reply With Quote