Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
As WWKD said, ROH has turned a bigger profit. They've also done some successful tours overseas. That might not mean anything to you, and it's kind of trivial, but ROH kind of has a longer reach if you are talking about the places they have done shows. TV deals should probably be considered more important, but it's just a possible defense for the "ROH is bigger than TNA" argument. The profit point is probably the best one.
|
You know I am an accountant right? Making more profit a year does not mean they are bigger. If that was true, then by that logic it means when WCW losing money in the millions, then any wrestling promotion losing less money or actaully turning $1 of profit was bigger than WCW. That means that while WCW lost a million, and ECW only lost a few hundred thousand, ECW would have been bigger than WCW. Profit does not equal size. It is entirely possible for a small business to make more actual profit than a large business. So profit is the wrost point to argue over size. For the 8 billionth time people, I went to business school, I am an accounant, knowing finicial statements is my job. You will not be able to argue with me on this point.
Now if you can show that RoH does more business, then they are bigger than TNA. Income does not equal profit, they are related but not the same.