Thread: Which match should be last at XX?
View Single Post
Old 03-08-2004, 06:37 PM   #17
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
There must be a world title on the line in the main event, its tradition (Im not counting WM1)... So we're down to The triple treat and Eddie/Kurt... Although the Eddie/Kurt match would be a better choice for the main event, there are two factors that come into play... #1, now this is only an assumtion, and its only fair, that WWE alternate between both titles every year... Like last year was the WWE title, so this year it should be the World Heavyweight, then next year will be the WWE title, and so on... # 2 is that, in the eyes of Vince atleast, the triple threat is the bigger caliber match... So I say the Triple Threat...
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote