View Single Post
Old 09-06-2007, 08:41 PM   #34
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Except for two or three casuals.

Speaking of which, Alienoid, old chum: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hyperbole
I know what hyperbole is, but I don't get how it fits here. Are you saying that I used hyperbole, or that you did? I don't recall it in this thread, and if you did, it's a convenient defense, as you missed the hyperbole I used when discussing CM Punk in another.

Just to be clear, though: I agree with you. Chris Jericho won't make a big change. He will make a little change, though. RAW would be more entertaining, we'd have someone to support, and you know the WWE wants their money's worth out of him, so it could signify a change in philosophies, with guys who have been around for a bit winning the top belt. You know Triple H will want to be WWE Champion soon, and I get the feeling Shawn Michaels would be hungry for it, too (his career seems to be winding down).

He won't boost ratings up to 6.0. That would be hyperbole. He certainly won't hurt, though.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote