View Single Post
Old 10-17-2007, 10:41 AM   #50
Scott Delaney
 
Posts: 440
Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Vegas
If you are going to honestly say that THOSE TWO were the reason for those ratings, then please give your brain to the salvation army.
Here's what I said you fucking shit-for-brains:

Quote:
In the year 2000, quarterly ratings were actually at its highest when Shane McMahon and Triple H were on TV (not The Rock!). I dare anyone to look this up.
Interesting how you stayed silent when people blamed Triple H for the low ratings a few years back (circa 2002).

Obviously, The Rock and Austin were far more integral to the boom of the Attitude era than Triple H. However, it's not like Triple H just "rode the waves" of a popular era. On the contrary, Triple H himself played an integral role in the overall poularity of the product....you lesbian.

It would be like saying, "Andre The Giant simply rode the wave of the Hogan era."

Rock and Austin were the main draws of the attitude era, but Triple H contributed MAJORLY to the success of the attitude era as well (whether he did it alongside DX or McMahon/Helmsley faction, etc. is irrelevant).

And yes, Bret Hart is STILL a self-righteous, whiny, SELFISH bitch that will NEVER let go of the past.

And YES - quarterly ratings were at its highest (in 2000) when Shane McMahon and Triple H were on the tel-eh-vision set.
Scott Delaney is offline   Reply With Quote