View Single Post
Old 10-23-2007, 10:15 PM   #8
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
If that's what you call a pragmatist who is wondering why a business would opt to continue to support a failing "brand" in the face of lackluster ratings (And when your ratings can be compared to Mosquito 2: With a Veangeance, yes, you're lackluster), then yep.

I've been called worse for using my brain before. No wonder people are so scared of it.
No one is afraid of your brain, KK.

I see your point. The ratings for ECW are lackluster, but I believe the show is the highest rated on Sci-Fi. I personally can't be fucked checking that, but that's what reports have told me. If they're accurate, I don't think it matters how poorly the show is doing, it's still better in comparison to everything else. Sci-Fi strikes me as a network trying to get any kind of win they can.

If I were the WWE, I would not celebrate yet. The show should be doing what it originally got, at the very least. Just because it got its deal renewed, so not mean that it's not a failure.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote