Thread: What do you think Raw's "Bottom" is?
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2007, 01:16 PM   #1
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
What do you think Raw's "Bottom" is?
Ratings question.

For a while, I thought the 3.6-3.8 range was the absolute bottom: We'd reached the lowest Raw could go, because that was essentially the die-hard smarktards and the like, who would watch wrestling no matter how phenomenally shitty it was.

Then we started seeing 3.2 as a regular rating, and now Raw normally does a 2.8.

Do you think it can go lower? How much lower? How low do you think it can go before Vince wises up, or TV networks start pulling the plug?

“There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.”

--John Rogers
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote