Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SuperSlim
Aight I've visited the wrestling board a bit just for news and bits and crap but there is one poster that I always skim past cause I get tired of seeing his long drawn out posts about shit nobody cares about that leads to some midcarder that nobody could give a rat's ass about becoming world champion in some screwed up storyline.
But that bolded part... Dude... seriously...shut up.
Because people have an opinion and don't like Samoa Joe you call them idiots. I don't care for Samoa Joe... and I could careless if he was a WWE guy, WCW, ECW, ROH, CZW, or whatever the hell else is out there. The fact is, he's just like all the others.
Only difference is he's fat and can move. That's all. He can't cut a promo if his career depended on it. It's monotone with the last couple of words being shouted. Monotone, shout, monotone, shout, rinse, lather, repeat process over and over til it's irritating and annoying.
Bottom line here Noid, you have your opinion, we all have ours. To declare people idiots for not liking someone you do is flat out idiotic in itself, considering I've seen you get your feathers ruffled up because someone speaks positively about someone that you didn't like. But I guess it's different. You and your family The "casual fans" area always correct and we should agree and like all the people you all like cause we're smarks so our opinions are considered invalid.
Get over yourself.
|
LOL. I'm pretty sure I actually usually defend most wrestlers, no matter how many people call them a useless sack of shit. I have defended Snitsky, Mark Henry and Viscera in the past. I used to mark for Hardcore Holly and Billy Gunn. Taste discriminating is not my cup of tea, but what I am sick of are the "Kliq" guys on here who do make those kind of discriminations, usually with ignorance. It's hypocritical to call me on calling people idiots and then letting the "Soma Joe" (what kind of shitty pun is that, anyway?) slide.
Especially since I am the one who is doing it in retaliation. I've always been one of the more passive members of the wrestling forums, but as it has been said, it's kind of expected you act like a dick round these parts.
I'd have no problem with people not liking Samoa Joe if they at least knew what the fuck they were talking about. "Joe only uses one submission." Bullshit, I can think of at least three that would be classified as trademarks of his, and that is in the tone-downed TNA. "Samoe Joe uses not psychology." Bullshit. What a fucking match of his. People are sick of guys who use a lot of strikes being labelled as good wrestlers? Well I'm sick of people who assume that because a guy has one overhyped match based around their striking (vs. Kobashi) he has to be shit.
The facts are, the "Soma Joe" people around here, for the most part, haven't even watched a Samoa Joe match. Secondly of all, my point was that their opinions mean shit to me. Everyone else agrees that Samoa Joe should be TNA's top guy. He's homegrown, he's a great wrestler, he
can cut a promo, and the IWC and casual fans love him, in general. The only real hate I see for him are on these boards, and it's without any informed opinion. It's just random hate to counteract the love he gets from most other places.
I called the Kliq fans who say that Samoa Joe can't be considered underused, and then say Kevin Nash (who can barely walk at this stage) is the most underused guy in the company? Boo fucking hoo, people call each other dicks on here all the time.
I'm done with you.