Thread: QUESTION: Are the canucks BETTER or WORSE since the Bertuzzi incident/trade deadline?
View Single Post
Old 03-11-2004, 06:02 PM   #7
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCWWF
I didn't bother to read that whole thing, but if you think a team losing one of their top scorers and enforcers makes it better, you must be from Canada.
You're right. You didn't read the whole thing. One of my main arguments was that perhaps the acquistions of Rucinsky, Sanderson, and Bergevin could make up for the loss of Bertuzzi. I also argued that perhaps the rest of the team would 'step up' in the absence of Bertuzzi (realizing that they no longer have any right to feel complacent).
Heyman is offline