Thread: QUESTION: Are the canucks BETTER or WORSE since the Bertuzzi incident/trade deadline?
View Single Post
Old 03-11-2004, 06:50 PM   #9
BCWWF
The People's Member
 
Posts: 18,092
BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)
Exclamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman
You're right. You didn't read the whole thing. One of my main arguments was that perhaps the acquistions of Rucinsky, Sanderson, and Bergevin could make up for the loss of Bertuzzi. I also argued that perhaps the rest of the team would 'step up' in the absence of Bertuzzi (realizing that they no longer have any right to feel complacent).
I read that part, and still don't think they are better. With Bertuzzi and the other three guys they would have been better than the three guys alone.
BCWWF is offline