Thread: So, Codebreaker... Yay or Nay? (RAW Spoilers)
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2007, 01:11 PM   #67
Nark Order
Soundly Defeated Wadding
 
Nark Order's Avatar
 
Posts: 40,590
Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Critic View Post
Thought provoking? Isn't that a little egotistical?

Or does not being KK somehow make you incapable of being an egotistical prick?

Really, I'm not sure your "No, you did it" style of repeating yourself can be defined as "rational," either. I don't know what it is with you people and burden of proof, but generally, you need to find sources and evidence before making crazy claims... especially when there's evidence to the contrary in the same goddamn thread. Prime example:

Did KK blow you off earlier?

Or did he point out that you were making a baseless and rather wild generalization without going into a fucking novel?

I saw the latter, but then again, it was pretty fucking obvious. I don't know, maybe you're going into the Alienoid flavor of emotional attachment blinding you to the inherant point, but holy shit! He did actually have a point in there. Instead of realizing that an active and sensical criticism was being indicated by that snide remark, though, all you saw was "OMG KK IS MAKING FUN OF MEEEE."

But y'know. Terrible social skills and all that other bullshit.

The only "rational, thought provoking" points I see here involve you flailing to grab KK's E-Balls, because God only knows you can't defend the fact that you did make a wild, baseless statement, followed by another, followed by a-fucking-nother.
The fact that you bolded your text makes you right. Listen, I never claimed to be or not be anything. I am myself all the time. If you find me to be a tad on the egotistical side then that's your judgement to make. Yes, when I argue with KK or anybody I find myself to be right in all instances. Irrational it may seem to you but why in the fuck would I say it if I didn't think I was right? If you go into arguements knowing that you're wrong but still trying to convince the masses that you are correct then that is entirely your deal but I don't do business that way. Anyway, by your standards I shouldn't even be taking this post seriously due to the fact that you most likely have trouble expressing yourself since you made such a long post. Or does that only apply to me? Guess I'm not the only one that contradicts myself, eh?
Nark Order is offline   Reply With Quote