Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
You mean like every single "top face" the WWE has? Triple H cuts the same promos every week. Shawn Michaels is great, but we all know how it goes by now, he gets disrespected by someone, goes looking for that respect, and beats the kid if they're a mid-carder the WWE is testing the waters with, or he loses if they're one of the pet projects, but he gets in a Sweet Chin Music or two. Jeff Hardy is pretty much the same as he was seven years ago.
I got sick of Austin during his Sheriff Austin crap, but when he returns now days, he's actually the highlight of the show, simply because he actually gets a reaction out of the fans.
Also, Austin recently said that if he wanted to, he could probably go one or two more years in the ring. If I were Vince, I'd consider selling off half the roster, and using the money to pay Austin to come back part-time. You get three shows for effectively one and a half rosters, which means guys will be better developed, and there's a lot more talent out there so there might be some good competition for a change, and then you have a fire lit under the WWE, increasing the quality of their product further.
|
my main argument is nobody gets the best of Austin and It's always the EXACT same thing.
HHH and HBK may act the same week in and week out, but there having different matches, take part in different segments and they don't always get the upperhand. Most of the time, yes...but not everytime. I just want Austin to get laid out one fucking time. Is that too much to ask for?