Thread: John Cena == The Rock
View Single Post
Old 12-15-2007, 11:09 PM   #26
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TL View Post
lol...come the fuck on. The rock was entertaining, Cena is not. The difference is the rock was in it to entertain, cena only cares about whether he's the no.1 guy with the title or not.

Although I agree with the first part of your statement (Rock being entertaining and Cena not being) I don't know how much that's really worth since entertainment is a case to case thing.

Some people enjoy watching CSPAN book readings and that's why it's on, I do not.
More people enjoy Soccer worldwide than any other sport, I however am hardly interested.

But, even though I agree with you personally, that kinda isn't fair. Rock did entertain MORE people, including you and I. That's true. Based on measurements like ratings, buyrates, merchandise sales and obvious things like popularity and mainstream success.

As for the last part of that statement, come on now... How do you know which each are in it for? Cenas given the title and pushed with it, how do you know that's all he cares about? And how do you know Rock was only in it to entertain? Where is he now?
Jeritron is offline   Reply With Quote