Thread: How credible is the IC belt right now?
View Single Post
Old 12-18-2007, 01:05 PM   #39
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06 View Post
See, this is it. Sure, Jeff Hardy has, to my surprise, become something quite good recently, but what good is being the IC Champion is the WWE pretends the belt doesn't even exist.

Honestly, I hope a heel costs Jeff Hardy his match at the Royal Rumble, and does so because Jeff is making the IC Title look like crap. I don't care if it's Carlito, DH Smith or Charlie fucking Haas. There needs to be a wake-up call to Jeff being IC Champion.

To be honest, I'd love for Randy Orton to up the ante in their Royal Rumble match, and request that the IC Title be on the line. Fuck, if the WWE truly cared about the belt, they'd have had it on the line during the match at Armageddon. What the WWE was basically suggesting there, was that being in the WWE Title division is more important than being IC Champion. It creates the impression that there is a huge field between being WWE Champion and being IC Champion, when really, the WWE would be best served to making the IC Title look like a silver medal.

You may actually be getting more absurd.
Jeritron is offline   Reply With Quote