Thread: Should TNA even have their own "answer" to WrestleMania?
View Single Post
Old 12-27-2007, 09:14 PM   #7
BigDaddyCool
Pelvic Sorcerer
 
BigDaddyCool's Avatar
 
Posts: 64,762
BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06 View Post
I remember thinking that TNA should make each and every PPV of their's a WrestleMania. Granted, you can have every match on every PPV end a feud, but there is no reason why a little PPV in October cannot house the epic end to a TNA World Heavyweight Title Match, while in the X-Division, a program just begins.

Yeah, just basically discuss TNA's PPV strategy, and what you like about it, and don't like about it. Is taking their show on the road a good idea? Are they using their PPVs right? Do they have too many a year? Just the right amount? Whatever you want.
If you have every ppv as their wrestlemania, it is like having Christmas once a month. It loses the meaning. That is a dumb idea.

As for TNA's ppv strategy, do they have one? It seems to me that their ppv mean little more than a show, only you have to pay to watch it.

Taking the show on the road is a good idea as long as they are charging for tickets.

If they are making money on every ppv, then they have enough, any that don't make money they should probably cut.
BigDaddyCool is offline   Reply With Quote