Thread: Should TNA even have their own "answer" to WrestleMania?
View Single Post
Old 12-30-2007, 05:27 AM   #25
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool View Post
I never said that. I said they only need to keep the ppvs they are making money on. I never gave a solid number. If they are breaking even or making money on every ppv, then keep them all. If they can only make money on 1, then keep that one, and make it extra special, make that the equilient of Maina or Starcade. If by scaling down, they get to a point where they only have 4 or 5, make those bigger shows of equal importance.

Also, their ppv titles suck.
You said they need an anchor for the year.

KK said that they need to establish good PPVs first.

Both imply to me that you think it's a good idea that there is a bigger PPV that stands out moreso than the others. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, that's just what I got from the subtext of your posts, even though you both talked about how the current product is crap, which is not what I'm looking to discuss.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote