01-02-2008, 10:34 AM
|
#38
|
|
President of Freedonia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
Well, in my vision, he'd be right at the end of the Rumble. He eliminates everyone in the ring that he smashes with the baseball bat, and he actually wins the 2008 Royal Rumble. I guess #29 would be acceptable, as well, and that way The Undertaker can enter #30 again, and the two can have a stare-down, with Sting tossing away the baseball bat, and taking on Taker with his bare hands, and eliminating him fair and square.
Sting would eliminate Flair during the match, which ends Flair's career. This pisses off Ric (to an extent), who cuts an epic promo on RAW, which I'm sure Flair could do well. Basically, to make a long story short, Sting somehow doesn't end up with the WrestleMania title shot, and Flair and Sting face off in a "Retirement Match" at WrestleMania, one last time, with the loser being forced out of active competition for good. Both men are inducted into the Hall of Fame the night before, and Sting wins at his first WrestleMania, and Flair becomes a manager/authority figure.
|
Giving Sting a Rumble win would be counterproductive if he didn't go on to challenge for a title, IMO. Also, I coulda swore that on the 15th Anniversary Raw it was mentioned that Flair's "win or retire" thing only applied in singles matches. Therefore, being eliminated from the Rumble wouldn't end his career.
And on a random note, I think it'd be rather lame if Taker gets #30 again. Not only did he get it last year...but I think he also got #30 on two other occasions. Nobody is THAT fortunate.
|
|
|