Okay, so I haven't been involved really with e-wrestling since 2005, but I know some people still into it and talk with them now and then. Well one guy running a show and roster asked me to judge some matches. I'm easy to agree to something, and said yea sure.
Well I went through them, and went all smark on them. I judged these roleplays like they were the TNA product. This leads to one match where one guy wrote a short roleplay on the match and another guy writes a fairly decent sized one.
I ended up loving the small roleplay because it really built the match and had a vivid description of the character and his feelings. Really made you feel for this guy to win. At the same time, the other guys roleplay was a comedy. It was somewhat funny, but reminded me of a TNA skit. Really, the match is never mentioned but once, and then quickly ignored.
I decide I want the short roleplay to win and tell the guy, and my reason why. He then tell me that I shouldn't base my decision that way and should choose the comedy because it was longer and more entertaining. We get into a huge argument over this, and ends with him just agreeing with me (most likely to shut me up).
It's a minute later I realize what I did...I just ARGUED over the improper build of a match for E-WRESTLING! God, I can't believe I've actually become that much of a smark that I'll argue over e-feds not doing things right...
...for my next trick I will talk about how one day I'll open my own e-fed and show how e-wrestling should really be run!
