Thread: Wow, some weird news tidbits:
View Single Post
Old 01-16-2008, 05:07 AM   #16
NeanderCarl
That's Not My Name
 
NeanderCarl's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,086
NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)NeanderCarl puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06 View Post
A lot of people make the "they should focus on the belts they currently have," but that's what they should have been doing all along, and is a statement of theory, anyway. Yes, in theory they should treat all their belts well, but also in theory, a brand should have more than one title.
There is no rule that says a brand should need more than one singles title, only what history dictates, but why couldn't WWE produce a compelling ECW product each week with an undercard centred around nothing more than jockeying for position for a prestigious shot at the ECW title, the only focus they should realistically have (kayfabe)?

Also, if they haven't been treating the already existant belts well so far, why should that change with, say, an ECW TV title? ECW is already low priority, why should an additional and unneccessary second ECW title be any different, or warrant any more thought than, for example, the WWE's own creation, the decades old Intercontinental title?
NeanderCarl is offline   Reply With Quote