Thread: Movies That Could Have been Good/Better With Different Actor(s)?
View Single Post
Old 01-17-2008, 10:32 PM   #1
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06 View Post
Beat me to it. Christian Bale proved with Equilibrium that he'd make a much better Neo than Keanu Reaves. Hugo Weeving was highly entertaining, but part of me wants to see what Andre Braugher could have done with the role. Or at least the part of Morpheus. I liked Laurence Fishbourne, too, but honestly: Andre Braugher could improve any movie he is in by doing anything. Most underrated actor ever.
Equilibrium was just an all-around better take on the concept.

Fishburne woulda been fine, but it seemed like the director told him to never emote or something. I think anyone in that role would have been as bad.

The Star Wars prequels could have benefitted from actors worth a crap. Some of the lines are terrible, but a lot of them are decent, and only really suck because of the assholes playing the characters.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote