Thread: QUESTION - Are Detroit, Colorado, and San Jose all susceptible for 1st round loses?
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2004, 12:22 AM   #6
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoRcHeEbA
why does everyone think with Bertuzzi gone the canucks don't have shit? honestly if the yanks didn't have Giambi does that mean they're not a world series competitor? what if the sox didn't have pedro? are they a bad team? is there not 23 other guys playing on a team that all suck?
EXACTLY. Besides - the canucks have acquired Sanderson AND Rucinsky. On paper - they aren't any worse than they were at the start of the year.

Add to the fact, the canucks no longer have that "sense of complacency". They are insecure right now. That's a GOOD thing. Everyone will step up in the absence of Bertuzzi. That's my take on it.
Heyman is offline