Thread: QUESTION - Are Detroit, Colorado, and San Jose all susceptible for 1st round loses?
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2004, 12:20 AM   #10
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Y2Ant
Sanderson seems to be doing well for himself
Yeah - he's no power forward like Bertuzzi, but he can put the puck in the net.....given a good center.

Rucinsky's a very solid player as well.

I still don't understand why almost EVERYONE is looking at this as a negative situation for the canucks.

Yes - losing Bertuzzi sucks more penis than Michael Cole, but atleast they were compensated 'adequately' for it. Sanderson and Rucinsky together (+Bergevin) are almost as valuable as Bertuzzi by himself IMO.

Also - do you think ANYONE on the canucks is going to be RELAXED from here on out? Hell no. They just lost their co-best player. As a result - EVERYONE will (or should) "step up" to the plate and play better. No one will slack off.
Heyman is offline