View Single Post
Old 01-24-2008, 04:01 AM   #50
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I can kind of see what you mean, but what we're talking about is basically two PPVs. Is elongating the Jeff Hardy win really the best for it? Once again, I think surprise is an issue. If Hardy is challenging for the belt at WrestleMania, he is 100% guaranteed to win, and the suspense dies a little. A lot of the excitement for this shot doesn't actually come from the fact that it's Jeff Hardy, the man is nowhere near Stone Cold Steve Austin or The Rock on those levels, but rather that there is the whole unpredictability factor.

I think the longer this storyline goes, the more chance the WWE has of dropping the ball.

The only real screwjob I see being effective at the Rumble, is Matt Hardy turning on Jeff, and then returning to feud with his younger brother for or after WrestleMania.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote