View Single Post
Old 01-26-2008, 11:11 PM   #13
DrA
 
Posts: 24,548
DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I hate to pull a KingofOldSchool and be an asshole, but:

I didn't really like it.

The movie was two and a half hours long and it felt as if nothing had happened throughout that whole time. There really wasn't any character development, and I just felt that either the screenplay was lackluster or the film was poorly edited. It kinda felt like Paul Thomas Anderson was trying too hard to make a Citizen Kane.

What is the deal with movies having these half-assed endings these days? It doesn't seem to matter, as people just seem to eat it up and label it as wonderul no matter what.
DrA is offline   Reply With Quote