Thread: Do you think some sort of "standings" system would benefit or hurt WWE?
View Single Post
Old 01-30-2008, 09:14 AM   #10
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeanderCarl View Post
Don't they have one anyway? The Power 25?

And it gets completely ignored on TV, and changes entirely week to week to suit the mood of the bookers. So, that's about as seriously as they take this kind of thing.
I thought the Power 25 ended a while ago?

Anyway, Power 25 was never intended as an actual ranking system, and that's the difference. It'd be great if they DID treat it as a ranking system, but it was more like an "extra" for the internet.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote