View Single Post
Old 02-15-2008, 06:22 AM   #23
ddpBANG
90% spam
 
ddpBANG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,814
ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)ddpBANG has a good deal of rep (10,000+)
Not so fast...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClockShot View Post
Breaking news out of ESPN.com

U.S. says Bonds failed steroid test in November 2001

Updated: February 14, 2008, 8:30 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- Barry Bonds tested positive for steroids in November 2001, just a month after hitting his record 73rd home run of the season, U.S. prosecutors said on Thursday.

...
U.S. filing typo spurs erroneous Bonds drug report



SAN FRANCISCO -- Federal prosecutors mistakenly filed court papers Thursday that incorrectly stated that Barry Bonds failed a steroids test in November of 2001 -- one month after breaking the single-season home run mark.

U.S. attorney spokesman Josh Eaton now says that the reference in Thursday's government court filing regarding Bonds testing positive was actually referring to a November 2000 test that was previously disclosed in the indictment of Bonds and had already been reported.

That drug test was included in the indictment unsealed last year, when prosecutors said the test was for a player they called "Barry B."



Also from ESPN.com
ddpBANG is offline